CoinTalk

The Data That Feels Like a Funeral

For years, the story of crypto in America has been written in neon: a raging, emotional drama of FOMO and panic, of to the moon rallies and apocalyptic crashes. It was a market powered by the raw, unfiltered nerve of the retail investor. But a new study from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) paints a radically different picture. The data is stark: the percentage of Americans holding crypto hasn't budged since 2021. The frenzied rush of new buyers has evaporated. Risk appetite is plummeting. The narrative, it seems, has frozen over.

The Hidden Bull Case in the Deep Freeze

But I see this deep freeze not as a death knell, but as the quiet, necessary precondition for a historic thaw. This isn't stagnation; it's sedimentation. The frothy, speculative top layer has blown away. What's left is a hardened, unmoving core of 27% of investors who have not sold. They are the bedrock. The "hot money" that chased Dogecoin and leveraged NFTs is gone. The fearful tourists who bought the top in 2021 have left the building. This isn't a declining market; it's a market that has finally expelled its weakest hands and is now sitting in a state of profound, disciplined equilibrium.

The Real Story: When "Boring" Becomes Powerful

The real story isn't in the stagnant ownership percentage. It's in the chilling of consideration. The slowdown in new entrants isn't a failure of crypto; it's a failure of the old, chaotic, scam-riddled narrative that surrounded it. The conversation has shifted from "get rich quick" to a grinding, macroeconomic debate about interest rates and inflation. Crypto is no longer a speculative side bet; it's now just another asset class waiting for its macro cue. So, is this widespread American investor apathy the final, boring capitulation before crypto becomes just another ticker on a Bloomberg terminal? Or is this the serene, quiet accumulation phase that legends are made of—the moment where the smart money builds its position while everyone else is asleep?

The Silent Majority Speaks: Decoding the Apathy

He's missing the forest for the trees. The hold steady at 27% after all this volatility is a MIRACLE. It means conviction. The weak are gone. This is the strongest the HODLer base has ever been. The next wave won't be driven by FOMO, but by necessity.

This is peak "Wall Street" energy. They've successfully framed crypto as 'risky' to keep retail on the sidelines. The 8% entering the market now aren't gamblers; they're calculators. This is how real, lasting foundations are built—slowly, quietly, and with institutional precision.

The apathy is a direct result of regulatory purgatory. Why would a normie dive in when the message from D.C. is pure hostility? This isn't a natural market cooling. It's a government-induced deep freeze. The trigger for the next boom will be regulatory clarity, not a Fed pivot.

They're confusing 'risk-taking' with 'smart allocation.' Dropping meme stocks doesn't mean you're fearful. It means you're growing up. The capital leaving junk is the capital that will flow into real crypto assets with utility. This is a maturation, not a retreat.

The data on young investors is a ticking time bomb. A third still see crypto as key to their goals. They're not buying now because they're priced out of life. Once student debt relief hits or the job market turns, that pent-up demand will be explosive. This isn't the end of their interest; it's a strategic pause.

This is exactly what happened before every major cycle. Everyone gets bored. The headlines stop. The noise dies down. That's when you accumulate. The FINRA study isn't a bearish report; it's a map to the bottom.

Who cares about the consideration of the masses? The game changed with the ETFs. The flow of funds is now a institutional spreadsheet exercise, invisible to these surveys. Retail sentiment is now a lagging indicator, not a leading one.

He's right about the chill, but wrong about the cause. It's not apathy; it's attention saturation. The public is exhausted by crypto drama. The next phase belongs to the boring, background technology they use without knowing it—the stablecoins, the settlement layers. The 'investment' story is taking a backseat to the 'utility' story. And that’s far more powerful.

As debates over privacy, innovation, and regulatory freedom continue to shape America’s crypto future, one truth remains: your ability to buy, trade, and build wealth in crypto shouldn’t depend on politics.

Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned investor, BYDFi gives you the tools to trade with confidence — low fees, fast execution, copy trading for newcomers, and access to hundreds of digital assets in a secure, user-friendly environment.

1- Safe.

2- Fast.

3-  Low Fees.

4- Built for beginners and pros.

Just when the market thinks the buying pressure might ease up, MicroStrategy proves them wrong. In a filing released today, the enterprise software company turned Bitcoin development firm announced it has acquired another $1 billion worth of Bitcoin.

This latest purchase brings their total holdings to staggering new heights, further solidifying their position as the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin in the world. But this isn't just about a company buying an asset; it is a masterclass in capital markets arbitrage that is rewriting the playbook for corporate treasuries.

The Infinite Money Glitch?

To understand why MicroStrategy keeps buying, you have to understand how they are buying. They aren't just using profit from selling software. They are utilizing a strategy that some analysts have jokingly dubbed the "Infinite Money Glitch."

MicroStrategy issues convertible notes (debt) to institutional investors. Because the demand for exposure to MicroStrategy is so high, they can borrow this money at incredibly low interest rates—sometimes near 0% or 1%. They then take that cheap cash and buy Bitcoin, an asset that has historically appreciated at a rate far higher than the interest on the debt.

• The Spread: They borrow at <1% and buy an asset growing at >20% annually.
• The result: The difference creates massive accretive value for their shareholders, boosting the stock price and allowing them to borrow more to buy more Bitcoin.

Creating a Supply Shock

The impact of these purchases on the open market cannot be overstated. Bitcoin has a fixed supply cap of 21 million coins. By aggressively vacuuming up available coins from exchanges and OTC desks, MicroStrategy is actively creating a supply shock.

When you combine this corporate accumulation with the daily inflows from the Spot ETFs, the amount of Bitcoin available for sale is shrinking rapidly. This creates a "powder keg" dynamic where even a small increase in demand can lead to explosive price appreciation.

The Corporate FOMO Effect

MicroStrategy's success is becoming impossible to ignore. For years, other CEOs watched from the sidelines, calling the strategy risky. Now, as they watch MicroStrategy outperform the S&P 500 and major tech stocks, the narrative is shifting.

We are beginning to see the early signs of Corporate FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out). Companies like Microsoft are facing shareholder votes on whether to investigate Bitcoin investing. Smaller public companies are already copying the MicroStrategy playbook. If even a fraction of the S&P 500 decides to allocate just 1% of their treasury to Bitcoin, the buying pressure from MicroStrategy will look like a drop in the bucket.

Conclusion

Michael Saylor is not gambling; he is engineering a financial revolution. By converting depreciating fiat currency into appreciating digital scarcity, MicroStrategy is setting a standard that every CFO will eventually have to study.

How AI Crypto Trading Bots Can Skyrocket Your Profits  

For years, crypto traders have battled sleepless nights, endless charts, and emotional rollercoasters that often lead to costly mistakes. Every trader knows the pain: you spot a potential opportunity, hesitate for a few seconds, and by the time you act, the moment has slipped away. Or worse—you panic during a sudden dip and sell too early, only to watch the market rebound minutes later.

But 2025 has ushered in a new era—an era where artificial intelligence is no longer just a buzzword. It is actively reshaping how we trade, invest, and build wealth in the cryptocurrency market. Enter AI-powered crypto trading bots—intelligent, automated tools designed to execute trades with speed, precision, and emotion-free logic.

If you’ve ever wondered whether these bots really work, how they actually operate, and whether they’re worth your trust, you’re in the right place. In this deep dive, we’ll unravel everything you need to know about crypto AI trading bots, their real-world performance, and how platforms like BYDFi, 3Commas, and Cryptohopper are empowering traders across the globe.

What Exactly Are AI Crypto Trading Bots?

At their core, AI trading bots are software programs that automatically buy and sell cryptocurrencies on your behalf. Unlike the old-school trading bots of the past—which simply followed pre-programmed rules—modern AI bots use machine learning, predictive algorithms, and real-time data analysis to make smarter decisions.

1- Market trends across multiple exchanges

2- Trading volumes and liquidity flows

3- News headlines and regulatory updates

4- Even social media chatter on platforms like X (formerly Twitter)

By piecing together all this data, the bot identifies potential price movements and acts faster than any human could. The result? More opportunities seized, fewer mistakes made.

It’s no wonder that in 2025, AI trading bots have become one of the hottest tools in the crypto world. Traders in the U.S., Europe, Asia, and the Middle East are all turning to automation to level the playing field against big institutions and 24/7 market volatility.

Do AI Trading Bots Really Work?

This is the million-dollar question—and the answer is yes, but with conditions.

AI bots can and do generate profits, but their success depends on three key factors: the quality of the algorithm, the market environment, and how well the trader configures the bot.

In fact, multiple studies in 2024 and 2025 show promising results. For example, a report tracking thousands of traders revealed that nearly 68% of AI bot users saw a positive return on investment within six months, provided they used reputable platforms and realistic strategies.

The Code on Trial: A Nation’s Crypto Conscience Faces a January Deadline

In a case that has become a lightning rod for the future of financial privacy and innovation in America, two software developers are scheduled to surrender to federal prison in early 2026. Their crime? Writing code. As a petition for their freedom surges past 3,200 signatures, a profound question echoes from the think tanks of Washington to the forums of the Bitcoin community: Will the United States criminalize the keyboard?

Keonne Rodriguez and William Lonergan Hill, the creators behind the privacy-focused Samourai Wallet, were sentenced to five and four years respectively after a plea deal saw them admit to a single conspiracy charge of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business. The more severe money laundering charge was dropped. Yet, their impending incarceration has ignited a firestorm, framing their sentencing not as a conclusion, but as the opening battle in a war over the soul of open-source development.

The Heart of the Controversy: When is Software a Crime?

At the center of the maelstrom is the Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI), which has launched a forceful campaign for a full presidential pardon. Their argument strikes at the legal foundation of the case. They contend the Department of Justice has dangerously stretched the definition of a  money transmitter  beyond recognition.

This prosecution misapplies federal law, argues BPI’s Zack Shapiro.  Samourai Wallet is non-custodial software. The developers never held, controlled, or touched their users’ funds. They built a tool, not a bank.  The Institute warns that erasing the critical legal line between publishing software and operating a financial intermediary sets a catastrophic precedent. It risks freezing the development of privacy-enhancing tools in the U.S., forcing innovation—and talent—overseas.

A pardon,  the BPI states,  would restore legal clarity and reaffirm that publishing non-custodial software is not, and should never become, a criminal act.

A Community Rallies: Voices from Bitcoin to the Ballot Box

The call for clemency has united a diverse coalition. From veteran broadcaster and Bitcoin advocate Max Keiser to media entrepreneur Marty Bent, high-profile figures are applying pressure. Walker America, host of The Bitcoin Podcast, directly appealed to the Oval Office: “President Trump should pardon the Samourai Wallet developers. If he truly wants America to be the Bitcoin capital of the world, then our government must not unjustly incarcerate Bitcoin developers.

The outreach has even reached Trump’s inner circle, with Keiser tagging Eric Trump to step it up.  Beyond crypto, the Libertarian Party of Oregon has joined the fray, championing the cause as one of free expression with a simple, powerful declaration: Code IS speech!

The Pardon Paradox: Billionaires vs. Developers

This plea for mercy lands on a desk with a unique history. President Trump has already granted several high-profile pardons at the intersection of finance and technology, most notably to Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht and, explosively, to former Binance CEO Changpeng  CZ  Zhao.

This track record, however, has sharpened the scrutiny around the Samourai case, creating what some see as a damning paradox. Bitcoin researcher Kyle Torpey voiced a sentiment simmering within the community:  The perceived corruption associated with the CZ pardon will look even worse if the Samourai Wallet devs aren’t pardoned for similar charges. How much of a financial contribution does one need to make to receive clemency?

The contrast is stark: a billionaire exchange founder involved in a massive compliance failure receives a pardon, while two open-source developers face years behind bars for creating a non-custodial tool. This  billionaire paradox  has transformed the case into a potent symbol of perceived inequity in justice.

The Ticking Clock: More Than Two Lives at Stake

As January 2026 approaches, the stakes extend far beyond the fate of two individuals. Advocates argue that the coming weeks will define the regulatory and innovative landscape for years to come. Will the U.S. embrace its potential as a leader in cryptographic innovation, or will it signal to developers that building privacy-preserving tools is a path to prison?

The petition continues to grow. The arguments are filed. The world is watching. The decision now rests in the realm of power, politics, and principle. The code has been written. The judgment on America’s crypto future is about to be delivered.

Ready to Take Control of Your Crypto Journey? Start Trading Safely on BYDFi

As debates over privacy, innovation, and regulatory freedom continue to shape America’s crypto future, one truth remains: your ability to buy, trade, and build wealth in crypto shouldn’t depend on politics.

WeChat Breach Hits Binance’s New Co-CEO: A Stark Warning for Crypto Leaders in a Web2 World

In a digital era where the lines between Web2 and Web3 blur, a simple messaging app has become the latest battleground for security. Yi He, the newly appointed co-CEO of cryptocurrency giant Binance, found herself at the center of a stark reminder: even the most prominent figures in crypto are vulnerable to the inherited risks of traditional platforms.

The breach unfolded not through a complex blockchain exploit, but through the hijacking of an old, abandoned WeChat account linked to a reclaimed mobile number.  WeChat was abandoned long ago, and the phone number was seized for use. It cannot be recovered at present,  Yi He initially stated in a translated post on X, highlighting a feeling of helplessness familiar to many. While Binance later confirmed a successful recovery in collaboration with WeChat’s security team, the brief window of compromise was all attackers needed.

Seizing the Moment, Cashing In

The speed of exploitation was telling. Almost immediately after the takeover, the compromised account was used to promote a token named Mubarakah. Blockchain analysts at Lookonchain tracked the maneuver, reporting that the attackers successfully pumped the token’s price and walked away with an estimated $55,000. This incident underscores a dangerous trend: a hijacked social account is not just a personal nuisance—it’s a powerful, ready-made launchpad for financial fraud targeting a vast, trusting audience.

A Disturbingly Low Barrier to Entry

This is not an isolated event. Just days earlier in November, Tron founder Justin Sun reported a similar takeover of his WeChat. In response to Yi He’s breach, SlowMist founder Yu Xuan resurfaced a critical analysis revealing just how alarmingly simple these attacks can be.

The method, as tested, is a chilling blend of technical access and social engineering. An attacker with leaked credentials can bypass security by merely contacting two of the account’s  frequent contacts —a category that can include casual group chat members or long-forgotten connections, not just close friends. In regions like China, where mobile numbers are recycled and reissued by carriers after a few months, the risk compounds. This system opens the door to credential stuffing, SIM-swap-style abuses, and targeted manipulation of recovery processes.

Yu Xuan’s advice cuts to the core: for high-profile individuals, especially those in crypto dealing with OTC trades or sensitive wallet discussions, digital hygiene is non-negotiable. Pruning unknown contacts, regularly rotating passwords, and heeding login alerts instantly are no longer best practices but essential protocols.

Echoes from the Top: I Will Not Promote That Coin

The ripple effect of such breaches is a climate of mistrust. Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao quickly took to X to clarify that he, too, has long abandoned his WeChat account. His preemptive warning was clear:  I would not promote any memecoin contract addresses on this account.  This statement serves as both a shield and a signal to the community—a reminder to scrutinize every message, even those appearing from the most verified of sources.

This incident is part of a worrying pattern for the ecosystem. Mere months ago, the official X account of BNB Chain was compromised, leading to phishing links and stolen user funds. While reimbursement followed, the blow to institutional credibility is harder to repair.

The Unavoidable Conclusion

The takeover of Yi He’s WeChat is more than a personal security lapse; it is a metaphor for the crypto industry’s ongoing struggle. As leaders build the decentralized future, they remain tethered to the centralized, often fragile, infrastructure of the past. The message is unequivocal: in the high-stakes world of digital assets, your weakest security link may not be your cold wallet, but an old phone number on a messaging app you forgot you had.

The guardians of Web3 must now become the most vigilant users of Web2. Their legacy, and the safety of their communities, depends on it.